Artificial Intelligence and Information Governance: Strengthening Global Security, through Compliance Frameworks, and Data Security
Titilayo Modupe Kolade
*
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tafawa Balewa House, Central Business District, Abuja, Nigeria.
Nsidibe Taiwo Aideyan
University of Lagos, University Road Lagos Mainland Akoka, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Seun Michael Oyekunle
Interswitch Group Nigeria, Plot 1648C, Oko-Awo Close, Karimu Kotun St, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria.
Olumide Samuel Ogungbemi
Centennial College, 941 Progress Ave, Scarborough, ON M1G 3T8, Canada.
Dooshima Louisa Dapo-Oyewole
Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho 83725, United States.
Oluwaseun Oladeji Olaniyi
University of the Cumberlands, 104 Maple Drive, Williamsburg, KY 40769, United States of America.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study examines the dual role of artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing and challenging global information governance and data security. By leveraging methodologies such as Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), the study investigates AI-specific vulnerabilities, governance gaps, and the effectiveness of compliance frameworks. Data from the MITRE ATT&CK Framework, AI Incident Database, Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI), and National Vulnerability Database (NVD) form the empirical foundation for this analysis. Key findings reveal that AI-driven data breaches exhibit the highest regulatory scores (0.72) and dependency levels (0.81), underscoring the critical need for robust compliance frameworks in high-risk AI environments. PCA identifies regulatory gaps (45.3% variance) and AI technology type (30.2% variance) as significant factors influencing security outcomes. SEM highlights governance strength as a primary determinant of security effectiveness (coefficient = 0.68, p < 0.001), while MCDA underscores the importance of adaptability in governance frameworks for addressing AI-specific threats. The study recommends adopting quantum-resistant encryption, enhancing international cooperation, and integrating AI automation with human oversight to fortify governance structures. These insights provide actionable strategies for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers to navigate the complexities of AI governance and align technological advancements with ethical and security imperatives in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Keywords: AI governance, data security, regulatory frameworks, quantum-resistant encryption, international cooperation